Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Packwood, et al. v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 24-1760
Plaintiff: TAYLOR PACKWOOD and ANDREA WOOD
Defendant: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CONTRA COSTA CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE CONTRA COSTA SHERIFF and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee: JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant: JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee: BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant: LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant: STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
Biers v. Dentons US et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff: Samuel L. Biers
Defendant: Dentons US a Utah Entity doing business as Dentons, Durham, Jones, Pinegar, Zions Bancorporation, Salal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andrea Wood v. County of Contra Costa, et al
as 21-15083
Defendant / Appellee: PATRICIA LOWE, MARY P. CAREY, JUDITH LAWRENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREA WOOD and ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD
Andrea Wood, et al v. County of Contra Costa, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15085
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, RAVINDER BAINS, in his indivdual capacity, KIM JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREA WOOD and ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD
Plaintiff: TP, a minor child and LIZA LEANO, guardian ad litem for minor child TP
Scott C., et al v. Riverview Gardens School Dist., et al
as 20-3177
Defendant: Gavin Allan, in his official capacity as Director of DESE's Civil Rights Compliance, Charles W. Shields, in their official capacities as Members of the Missouri State Board of Education, Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, (DESE) and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Congregations United and Empower Missouri
Defendant / Appellant: Riverview Gardens School District and Special Administrative Board
Plaintiff / Appellee: Rio M., Next Friend for minor Miles M., Scott C., by and through Next Friend, Melissa C., Melissa C., as Next Friend for minor Scott C. and others
Scott C., et al v. DESE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3077
Defendant / Appellant: Roger Dorson, in his official capacity as Interim Commissioner of Education and Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, (DESE)
Defendant: Gavin Allan, in his official capacity as Director of DESE's Civil Rights Compliance, Charles W. Shields, in their official capacities as Members of the Missouri State Board of Education, Andrea Woods, in her official capacity as Riverview Gardens Homeless Coordinator and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Congregations United and Empower Missouri
Plaintiff / Appellee: Rio M., Next Friend for minor Miles M., Scott C., by and through Next Friend, Melissa C., Miles M., by and through Next Friend, Rio M. and others
Andrea Wood, et al v. County of Contra Costa, et al
as 20-15553
Defendant / Appellee: RAVINDER BAINS, in his indivdual capacity, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a government entity, EDYTH WILLIAMS, in her official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TP, a minor child and ANDREA WOOD
Brackens v. Woods et al
as 4:2013mc02953
Plaintiff: Stacey Warren Brackens
Defendant: Andrea Woods and Social Service of Aurora, Colorado

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?