Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Higgins v. USA
as 1:2016cv11188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew C. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bochart v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2013cv11753
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Bochart
Defendant:
City of Lowell , Eric G Wayne and Hookslide Kelly's, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10794
Plaintiff:
B.C. Produce, Inc. , Boston Tomato & Packaging, LLC , Coosemans Boston, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., Andrew C. Sexeny and George E. Sexeny
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Mutual Produce Corp. v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., et.al
as 1:2012cv10774
Plaintiff:
Mutual Produce Corp.
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., Andrew C. Sexeny and George Sexeny
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv30057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11987
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv11987
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
