Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERVINCHAK et al v. EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2020cv05421
Defendant:
ANDREW C. WEAVER, EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP, W. SCOTT WIGLESWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE LINKENS, DONNA BERVINCHAK and KENNETH REISIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BERVINCHAK et al v. EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv05421
Defendant:
ANDREW C. WEAVER and EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
ROSE LINKENS, DONNA BERVINCHAK and KENNETH REISIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HOHN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2020cv00795
Petitioner:
ANDREW C. HOHN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Loftus Adjustment Company et al
as 1:2020cv00512
Defendant:
Jherion Levesque, Doe 1, Frank Hurst and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROSE v. UNKOWN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENT et al
as 5:2019cv06018
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW C. LYNCH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Giles v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2019cv00203
Defendant:
Dauphin County and Dauphin County Domestic Relations
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrard v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01590
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Sherrard
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SPORT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, LLC v. WOOLLEY et al
as 5:2017cv02358
Plaintiff:
SPORT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant:
ANDREW C. WOOLLEY and THE WOOLLEY GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
