Cases 11 - 20 of 104
(PC) Martin v. Mendoza, et al.
as 1:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Benjamin Mendoza, Flores, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martin v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Michael Zimmerman, County of Madera, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martin v. Pogue
as 1:2022cv01377
Petitioner:
Jared Andrew Martin
Respondent:
Tyson J. Pogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Martin v. Delacruz et al
as 1:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
A. Delacruz, Christian Pfeiffer, City of Delano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martin v. Castillo et al
as 1:2022cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
D. Castillo, Christian Pfeiffer and Officer Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martin v. Pogue
as 1:2022cv01113
Petitioner:
Jared Andrew Martin
Respondent:
Tyson J. Pogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Martin v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01083
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Christian Pfeiffer, City of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
as 3:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12273
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ANDREW MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Martin v. Longardener et al
as 1:2022cv01001
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Katherine Longardener, Christian Pfeiffer, County of Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
