Cases
Ray et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2023cv01105
Plaintiff: Matthew B. Ray and Andrew Vail
Defendant: Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Vail v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 1:2019cv02021
Defendant: VCM, Rochester General Hospital and Dr. Vincent Chang
Plaintiff: Andrew Vail and Andrew E. Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11822
Defendant: New York City Department Of Corrections, The City of New York and Correction Officer Egwu
Plaintiff: Andrew Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv09169
Defendant: New York City Department of Corrections, Lionel Brown, New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
First Federal Bank et al v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2013cv00215
Plaintiff: First Federal Bank
Defendant: Nationwide Insurance Company of America , Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Andrew Vail
Receiver: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Vail v. Fischer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2012cv01718
Plaintiff: Andrew Vail
Defendant: Brian Fischer, Thomas LaValley, Bran Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vail v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv06125
Plaintiff: Andrew Vail
Defendant: The City of New York, Otilla Phillips-Drake and Sein Than
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06125
Plaintiff: Andrew Vail
Defendant: The City of New York, Otilla Phillips-Drake and Sein Than
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?