Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Martinez v. Griffin Health Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00839
Plaintiff: Solange Martinez
Defendant: Griffin Health Corporation, Waterbury Hospital, Griffin Family Physicians and others
Oyarzun v. Griffin Health Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff: Luisa Oyarzun
Defendant: Griffin Health Corporation, Waterbury Hospital, Griffin Family Physicians and others
Trisvan v. Heyman
as 20-1489
Defendant / Appellee: Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC and Tom Heyman
Defendant: Sir Phillip Hampton, Chairman of Glaxosmithkline, Glaxosmithkline, PLC, Johnson and Johnson Development Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Trisvan
Trisvan v. Heyman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00084
Defendant: Joaquin Duarto, Alex Gorsky, Sir Phillip Hampton and others
Plaintiff: John Trisvan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Trisvan v. Heyman et al
as 1:2015cv01392
Plaintiff: John Trisvan
Defendant: Tom Heyman, Alex Gorsky, Joaquin Duarto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In GLAXOSMITHKLINE ERISA LITIG
as 11-2289
Plaintiff - Appellant: Charles J. Gum, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated and Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Does, 1-30
Defendant - Appellee: Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Hayes v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2010cv07275
Plaintiff: Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gum v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2010cv06419
Plaintiff: Charles J. Gum
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?