Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Angelica Clark, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES, RUSSELL E. BURGER and others
Defendant:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-35560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EVANS and GARRISON DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie, GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES and others
Clark et al v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv01436
Plaintiff:
Rowan Maher, Nathaniel West, Ellen Gass and others
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, John Does, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
