Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kimmel et al v. Schuylkill County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Kimmel and Esther Kimmel
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison, Lt. Cory Sable, Angelo Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20985
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv06360
Petitioner:
ANGELO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Seale et al v Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01032
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Seale, Ada B. Oliveras-Cruz, Albert Turrigiano and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seale et al v Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Aaron Seale, Ada B. Oliveras-Cruz, Albert Turrigiano and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19584
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2019cv05581
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Angelo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez-Zapata et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pignataro, Catherine Phillips, Michael Potts and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
RODRIGUEZ v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv02437
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
as 1:2017cv03767
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corp.
Plaintiff:
Angelo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
