Cases 31 - 40 of 8,829
Harris v. City National Bank et al
as 6:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Shai Harris and Jay Williams Living Trust Dated
Defendant:
City National Bank, Andrew Adrian Dioli, RushMyFile, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Home Team 668 LLC v. The Town of East Hampton
as 24-959
Plaintiff:
HOME TEAM 668 LLC
Defendant:
THE TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, LINDA SCICOLONE, ANN GLENNON and others
Cantrell v. Weiner
as 9:2024cv80449
Appellant:
Lisa Ann Cantrell
Defendant / Appellee:
Robin R. Weiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal
Abrams v. Wittman et al
as 2:2024cv02719
Petitioner:
Adams Abrams
Respondent:
Andy Wittman, Anne M. Danziger, Anthony Prudenti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MATARAZZO et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MATARAZZO and ANN MATARAZZO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Panacea Plant Sciences Inc et al v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Panacea Plant Sciences Inc and David Heldreth
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, United States Department of Justice, Anne M Milgram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Anthony Dale, et al
as 24-8013
Petitioner:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY DALE, BRETT JACKSON, JOHNNA FOX and others
Mabute, et al. v. Medliant Inc., et al.
as 24-2119
Plaintiff:
ELIAHKIM MABUTE and JEDDY ANNE DELGADO
Defendant:
MEDLIANT INC. and MEDLIANT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
