Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Isabell v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Ann Margaret Isabell
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls and Sherry Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldridge v. Sallaz
as 3:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Patricia Ann Aldridge
Respondent:
J.D. Sallaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Polly Anne Sanders
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sunshine v. Jividen et al
as 2:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ann Sunshine
Defendant:
Betsy C. Jividen, Scott Felton, David Defibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sunshine v. Searls et al
as 5:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
Shelby Searls and David Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunshine v. Searls et al
as 3:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
Shelby S. Searls, Laura Shaw, David Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunshine v. Jividen
as 2:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
Betsy C. Jividen and WV Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winegar v. Adams
as 1:2020cv00246
Respondent:
Warden Adams
Petitioner:
Cary Ann Winegar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
