Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Iannone, et al. v. KK Wellness and Autism Consulting, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anne Marie Iannone, Ann-Marie Iannone, Brandy Flotten and others
Defendant:
KK WELLNESS AND AUTISM CONSULTING, LLC, Kelly Killen and Jodi Sheakley-Wright
Dobson v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dobson
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Bernard W. Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Blue Horizon Development, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00099
Defendant:
Ann-Marie Stephens, Edward Stephens, Blue Horizon Development, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kate Dean
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. AM Lapomarda et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Ann Marie Fulcher and AM Lapomarda
Plaintiff:
Lakia Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers v. Williams
as 3:2019cv00126
Petitioner:
Anne Marie Chambers
Respondent:
D.K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Inova Health Care Services
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Inova Health Care Services
Plaintiff:
Anne-Marie King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hill Top Research Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00553
Defendant:
Anne Marie Salapatek, Cliantha Research, Inc., Piyush Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGranaghan v. United States Agency for International Development, Office of Inspector General
as 1:2017mc00025
Movant:
Anne-Marie McGranaghan
Respondent:
United States Agency for International Development, Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chambers v. Williams
as 3:2017cv00640
Petitioner:
Anne Marie Chambers
Respondent:
D. K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
