Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Bentz v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv01753
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Michael Randle, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Michael Randle, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv06863
Plaintiff:
Bobby Heard
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Ms. Ingleson, Amy Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Randle et al
as 1:2011cv04248
Plaintiff:
Walter Blount
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Marcus Hardy, Leslie C. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ames v. Randle et al
as 1:2011cv00920
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Ames
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Terry McCann, Anthony Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wilson
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Clarnce Wright, B. Kerl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wilson
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Kenneth Osborne, Niles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Dockery et al
as 1:2010cv01303
Plaintiff:
Thomas Whitehead
Defendant:
Anna Dockery, Grievance Officers and Marcus Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv05772
Plaintiff:
Bennie K. Ellison
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Stateville Correction Center, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
