Cases 1 - 10 of 27
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19930
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
ANNE ROSE EASTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSE v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv03222
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEY ANN ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2020cv00355
Plaintiff:
David Kronberg, Quinn Parker, Kenneth Rose and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rose v. Tulsa County District Attorneys et al
as 4:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Attorneys, Oklahoma District Attorneys Council and Oklahoma State Department of Health
Plaintiff:
Corretta Ann Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rose-Martin v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv01370
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Anne Rose-Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rose v. Martin Luther Home et al
as 2:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kathryn Anne Rose
Defendant:
Martin Luther Home and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv09285
Plaintiff:
Queen Lynnah Bey
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYC Department of Education, Stacy Ann Rose Teleford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
