Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Herbert v. Safeway Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01518
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Herbert
Defendant:
Safeway Inc, Snohomish County Sheriff's Department, Snohomish County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Herbert v. King County, et al
as 17-35798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY G. HERBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation, SERGEANT FASEN and SERGEANT FERREIRO
Herbert v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv01168
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Herbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Herbert v. King County et al
as 2:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Herbert
Defendant:
King County, Fasen, Michael Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert v. King County
as 2:2014cv01906
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Herbert
Defendant:
King County, Karlsson, Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Herbert v. Walter Lovell, et al
as 14-35562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY G, HERBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER LOVELL, Individually and in His Official Capacity, JENISE TEMKO, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, ALAN JACKSON, Individually and in His Official Capacity and others
Anthony Herbert v. Caryn Vertucci, et al
as 14-35496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY G. HERBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
CARYN VERTUCCI, Public Health Dentist, SASKIA SCHAFFER, CHRISTOPHER DERRAH and others
Herbert v. Silva
as 2:2014cv00763
Petitioner:
Anthony G. Herbert
Respondent:
Wayde Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Herbert v. King County et al
as 2:2014cv00730
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Herbert
Defendant:
King County, Jason Wanner, Tomasini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert v. Vertucci et al
as 2:2013cv00640
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Herbert
Defendant:
Caryn Vertucci, Saskia Schaffer, Christopher Derrah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
