Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hawkins v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner and Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Kirby et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Kate Mayes, Kirby, Shaw and others
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Angle et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Nathan Angle, B Myers, Ind Dep't of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Anthony Hawkins v. David Kao
as 5:2022cv01185
Petitioner:
Terrence Anthony Hawkins
Respondent:
District Attorney David Kao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrence Hawkins v. Mosqudea et al
as 5:2021cv01741
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hawkins and Terrence Anthony Hawkins
Defendant:
Mosqudea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Hyatte
as 3:2021cv00527
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
William Hyatte and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2020cv01409
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hawkins
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Herold Wickham, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Hawkins v. Dr. Loh et al
as 5:2020cv00567
Plaintiff:
Terrence Anthony Hawkins
Defendant:
Lieutenant Breiten and Dr. Loh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Anthony Hawkins v. Loh et al
as 5:2020cv00556
Plaintiff:
Terrence Anthony Hawkins
Defendant:
Dr. Loh and Breiten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2019cv00264
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
