Cases 1 - 10 of 30
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR. and CHESTERFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MADDY et al
as 2:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MADDY, PEACH, ERIC HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WOODS et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
WOODS and GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
