Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVER v. NEXSTAR BROADCASTING INC et al
as 5:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER and ANTHONY OLIVER RESTRICTED - CHECK FILER STATUS
Defendant:
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING INC, GATEHOUSE MEDIA GEORGIA HOLDINGS INC, GRAY MEDIA GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Anthony Oliver v. Ameris Bank, et al
as 21-13005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERIS BANK, CHEX SYSTEMS, INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
OLIVER v. NEXTSTAR BROADCASTING INC et al
as 5:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
NEXTSTAR BROADCASTING INC, GATEHOUSE MEDIA GEORGIA HOLDINGS INC, GRAY MEDIA GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2021cv00130
Defendant:
Stuart Glasby, Todd H. Martin, Adina C. Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Ameris Bank et al
as 4:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Geovista Credit Union, Equifax Information Solutions, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Oliver v. Peluso et al
as 4:2020cv00257
Defendant:
Joseph R. Bolton and Larry A. Peluso
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
