Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BETZ et al v. SPISAK
as 3:2020cv10166
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY P BETZ, BECKY J BETZ, ANTHONY P. BETZ and others
Defendant:
OAKLEY H SPISAK, Does I-V and OAKLEY H. SPISAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORA et al v. RICH et al
as 2:2020cv01372
Defendant:
ANTHONY P RICH and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE FLORA and GLENN A FLORA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLPE v. TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY et al
as 2:2019cv05778
Defendant:
NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD SCHWARZ, TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VOLPE and M.D. ANTHONY P. VOLPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLAYTON v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv16476
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, DENISE M. MORRISON and ANTHONY P. DISILVESTRO
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. CLAYTON
BANKALTER v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv15694
Defendant:
ANTHONY P. DISILVESTRO, CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and DENISE M. MORRISON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BANKALTER
MARDER v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv14385
Plaintiff:
MARISA MARDER
Defendant:
ANTHONY P. DISILVESTRO, CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and DENISE M. MORRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KUBU v. EISENBERG et al
as 2:2018cv09124
Plaintiff:
JERRY THOMAS KUBU
Defendant:
STEVEN K EISENBERG , JACUELINE F MCNALLY , DAVID M LAMBROPOULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FOGG v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2017cv02326
Plaintiff:
NORMAN BEN FOGG
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, HARRY EARLE, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCARCELLA v. MATHEIS et al
as 3:2016cv08286
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. SCARCELLA
Defendant:
R. BRETT MATHEIS, JOHN J. BURKE, III, ANTHONY P. KEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
