Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Christopher et al v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 4:2018cv00898
Plaintiff:
Humberto Johnson, Michael McIntyre, Yumi Arney and others
Defendant:
Audi of America LLC, Volkswagen Group of America Inc, Audi Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Vaughn et al
as 4:2015cv02554
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
G Vaughn, B Norman and C Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Respondent:
Robert Stevens, Rick Thaler and John T Montford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 6:2013cv00913
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, Rick Thaler and John T Montford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Baker et al
as 5:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
J Baker, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Montford Unit Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Rogers vs. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 5:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Sec of Vet Affairs Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rogers v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Director et al
as 5:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Director, Treatment Team Physician and J Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
