Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. City of Albany
as 20-3518
Defendant / Appellant:
Phillippa P. Garland-Wilcox, Administrator for the estate of Kenneth P. Wilcox, Anthony Ryan, Michael Sbuttoni and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lavell Jones
Dukes v. City of Albany
as 20-3519
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Ryan, Michael Sbuttoni, City of Albany and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Carl Dukes
Jones v. Albany et al
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Lavell Jones
Defendant:
The City of Albany , Ronald Matos , P.J. McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. City of Albany et al
as 1:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
Carl Dukes
Defendant:
City of Albany , Phillippa P. Garland-Wilcox , Anthony Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Albany et al
as 1:2017cv04082
Defendant:
The City of Albany, Phillipa P. Garland-Wilcox, Ronald Matos and others
Plaintiff:
Lavell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03308
Defendant:
City of New York, Lieutenant John Doe or Jane Roe and The New York City Police Department
Whose First Name And Tax ID Are Unknown At This Time:
Detective Davis
Whose Name And Tax ID Are Unknown At This Time:
Detective/Officer John Doe and Sergeant John Doe or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Gomez
as 13-1192
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Gomez, AKA Anthony Ryan
Augstein v. Leslie
as 12-5119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Armin Augstein
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Ryan Leslie, AKA Ryan Leslie and NextSelection, Inc.
Augstein v. Leslie
as 1:2011cv07512
Plaintiff:
Armin Augstein
Defendant:
Anthony Ryan Leslie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryans v. Fischer et al
as 2:2010cv01969
Defendant:
Bryan Fischer and Philip Heath
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ryans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
