Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Athena Reddersen v. The United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
Athena Reddersen
Defendant:
The United States of America, The United States Department of Justice, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Antonio Cardenas Gutierrez, Sr. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 2:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Cardenas, Jr., Mr. Antonio Gutierrez Cardenas, Sr., Antonio Cardenas Gutierrez, Sr. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture and Does 1 to 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gutierrez v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Gutierrez
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Centeno-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 22-1681
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO CENTENO-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Antonio Rafael-Gutierrez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3254
Petitioner:
ANTONIO RAFAEL-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Antonio Gutierrez v. Steve Shelton, et al
as 21-35158
Defendant / Appellee:
J. TAYLOR, STEVE SHELTON, Medical Director, Health Services Oregon Department of Corrections and GARTH GULICK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ
Antonio Garcia-Gutierrez v. William Barr
as 20-72244
Petitioner:
ANTONIO GARCIA-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Marco Marroquin-Gutierrez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-11887
Petitioner:
MARCO ANTONIO MARROQUIN-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Antonio Tapia Salazar v. William Barr
as 19-72900
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TAPIA SALAZAR, AKA Jorge Lopez Martinez, AKA Antonio Jose Tapia, AKA Jose Antonio Tapia Gutierrez
Antonio Gutierrez v. Brad Cain
as 19-35927
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, SRCI Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
