Cases 1 - 10 of 22
USA v. Carrillo
as 24-50037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Antonio Carrillo
USA v. Carrillo-Rodriguez
as 22-40590
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Antonio Carrillo-Rodriguez
Antonio Carrillo-Reveles v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv02458
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrillo-Reveles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Antonio Cruz-Ramos
as 19-50706
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONIO CRUZ-RAMOS, also known as Marcos Cruz-Cifuentes, also known as Antonio Carrillo-Ramos
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rothman v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Al Rothman
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldstein v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Howard Goldstein
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gonzalez v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00465
Plaintiff:
Ileana A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witmer v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00209
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
Richard N. West
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, David E. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Newman v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00442
Plaintiff:
Samuel Newman
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
