Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Carrillo
as 24-50037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Antonio Carrillo
USA v. Carrillo-Rodriguez
as 22-40590
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Antonio Carrillo-Rodriguez
USA v. Antonio Cruz-Ramos
as 19-50706
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONIO CRUZ-RAMOS, also known as Marcos Cruz-Cifuentes, also known as Antonio Carrillo-Ramos
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Witmer v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00209
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrillo v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03740
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrillo
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Miguel Carrillo
as 15-50064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANTONIO CARRILLO
Carrillo v. United States Of America
as 7:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Carrillo
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Miguel Carrillo
as 10-50243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANTONIO CARRILLO
Wampold et al v. Pershing LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
Milford Wampold, III, Wampold & Company, Milford Wampold Support Foundation and others
Defendant:
Pershing LLC, Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's of London in Syndicates 2987,2488,1866,1084,1274,4000 & 1183, Jason Green and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
USA v. Rivas-Salinas
as 07-50815
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO RIVAS-SALINAS, also known as Marco Antonio Carrillo-Luna
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
