Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
ERICSSON, INC. et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 1:2015mc00826
Petitioner: ERICSSON, INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Respondent: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Application for Letters Rogatory
PAULSON v. APPLE INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00556
Plaintiff: LAUREN PAULSON
Defendant: APPLE INC., SPRINT, T-MOBILE US, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01034
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIM v. APPLE, INC.
as 1:2014mc00610
Plaintiff: SEUNGJIN KIM
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SOFTVIEW LLC V. APPLE INC., ET AL. Featured Case
as 1:2012mc00667
Petitioner: SOFTVIEW LLC
Respondent: APPLE INC. and AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
APPLE, INC. v. CAMBRIDGE SILICON RADIO INTERNATIONAL, PLC Featured Case
as 1:2012mc00313
Petitioner: APPLE, INC.
Respondent: CAMBRIDGE SILICON RADIO INTERNATIONAL, PLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD. v. APPLE, INC. Featured Case
as 1:2012cv00402
Plaintiff: TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD.
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NOKIA CORPORATION v. APPLE INC. Featured Case
as 1:2011mc00295
Plaintiff: NOKIA CORPORATION
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Movant: ROBERT G. STERNE , Richard D. COLLER , GLENN J. PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
NOKIA CORPORATION v. APPLE INC. Featured Case
as 1:2011mc00284
Petitioner: NOKIA CORPORATION
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Respondent: ROBERT STERNE , GLENN PERRY , RICHARD COLLER and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. et al Featured Case
as 1:2010cv01629
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?