Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Hanson v. Apple Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02413
Plaintiff:
Jina Hanson
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Jeannine Nittner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
De Porceri v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 5:2013cv05157
Plaintiff:
Paul De Porceri
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America , CIGNA Corporation , Apple, Inc.'s Long Term Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kalin v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2013cv04727
Plaintiff:
Taylor Kalin
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Kilker et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2013cv03775
Plaintiff:
Adam Kilker and Brandon Fisher
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Frlekin et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2013cv03451
Plaintiff:
Amanda Frlekin and Dean Pelle
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richardson v. Apple Inc., et. al.
as 2:2012cv02032
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Richardson
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Rhonda Hess-Beavers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forest Ambulatory Surgical Associates, L.P. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv02916
Respondent:
AG Neovo Technology Corp, Health Benefits Plan, AG Neovo Technology Corp., AT&T Medical Plan and others
Petitioner:
Forest Ambulatory Surgical Associates, L.P.
Unknown:
Gwendolyn L. Fanger and Paul Tweedie Smith
Allen v. Apple, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 5:2009cv04459
Plaintiff:
Laura Allen and Laura Allen
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan and Cigna Group Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walsh v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv04918
Plaintiff:
David Walsh and David Walsh
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
