Cases 31 - 40 of 170
Coronavirus Reporter Corporation et al v. Apple Inc
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Coronavirus Reporter Corporation and Calid Inc
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Bakay et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Luisa Bakay, Elisa Jones and Leticia Shaw
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pierre et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Lamartine Pierre, Mark Whitlock, Lynn-Marie Rodrigues and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Golden v. Apple Inc.
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY GOLDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01599
Plaintiff:
Steven Floyd
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SaurikIT, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 22-16527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAURIKIT, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Societe du Figaro v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2022cv04437
Plaintiff:
Socit du Figaro, SAS, Lquipe 24/24 SAS, le GESTE and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
