Cases 21 - 30 of 109
KING v. APPLING COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
BRANDON O'NEAL KING
Defendant:
APPLING COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BAXLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, APPLING COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Six EA 1 Troy Oz Great American Mint Coins et al
as 1:2021cv01727
Defendant:
One EA 1/2 Troy Oz Great American Mint Coin, One, One SandDisk 16GB USB Drive, One HTC Cell Phone Serial Number HT38HWA01092 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Midvale Indemnity Company v. Apple Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
Midvale Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Apple Construction, LLC, Dominique Hebert, Kaitlin Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Silvera v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03777
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Sprint Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Silvera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payton v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04326
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vickie Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Zipit Wireless, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2020cv02488
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zipit Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Smith v. Brunswick Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Brunswick Judicial Circuit, Mark Melton, Appling County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brunswick Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Brunswick Judicial Circuit, Stephen G. Scarlett, Sr., Brunswick District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
