Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bardes v. Bush et al
as 1:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Bardes
Defendant:
George Walker Bush, Richard Bruce Cheney, William Henry Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Microsoft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCloskey v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
SEAN McCLOSKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Waters et al
as 2:2017cv00532
Defendant:
Adams, Waters, Apple iTunes and others
Plaintiff:
John Hill
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Trois v. Apple Tree Auction Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00688
Defendant:
Apple Tree Auction Center, Inc. and Samuel Schnaidt
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Trois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stefanou et al v. Apple Inc
as 1:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lauri Stefanou , Jarrod Byer and Carly Byer
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
APPLE v. AGRIUM U.S., INC. et al
as 3:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
RANDY APPLE
Defendant:
AGRIUM U.S., INC., CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC. and AGRIUM U.S. INC./CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC.'S BENEFITS (SEVERANCE) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
APPLE v. AGRIUM U.S., INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
RANDY APPLE
Defendant:
AGRIUM U.S., INC., CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC. and AGRIUM U.S. INC./CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC.'S BENEFITS (SEVERANCE) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Burnzie's Old Trail Inn, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Shelby Singleton Music, Inc. , House of Cash, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Burnzie's Old Trail Inn, LLC and John R Burns, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
