Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Althouse v. USA
as 23-10282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin R. Althouse, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Mentally Disabled and or Special Needs Offenders
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of Texas, County of Dallas, Texas and others
Althouse v. USA
as 22-10351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin R. Althouse, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Mentally Disabled and or Special Needs Offenders
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of Texas, County of Dallas, Texas and others
Althouse v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Althouse and Kevin R Althouse
Defendant:
United States of America, The State of Texas, The County of Dallas Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74053
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL MICHELLE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv40105
Plaintiff:
April A. Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pope v. Chatham et al
as 3:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Cecil Andrew Pope
Defendant:
Andrew Chatham, Lisa Smith, Reed Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Chatham et al
as 4:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Cecil Andrew Pope
Defendant:
Andrew Chatham, Lisa Smith, Reed Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2015cv13906
Plaintiff:
April S. Smith and Williams C. Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as ALN/3:15-cv-01960
Plaintiff:
April S. Smith and Williams C. Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
