Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yosif v. Araba Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS) et al
as 2:2016cv11658
Plaintiff:
Ikram Yosif
Defendant:
Araba Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS), Lina Hourani-Harajli and Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yosif v. Araba Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS) et al
as 4:2016cv11658
Defendant:
Araba Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS), Lina Hourani-Harajli and Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)
Plaintiff:
Yosif and Ikram Yosif
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kira v. Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services
as 2:2009cv10683
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Kira
Defendant:
Arab Community Center For Economic And Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
