Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00917
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv00868
Plaintiff: KRISTINA ELSAESSER and NO PARTY
Defendant: ARAMARK HEALTHCARE SUPPORT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ABDELHADY v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01334
Plaintiff: HDEEL ABDELHADY
Defendant: GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00472
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVANS v. ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2019cv02092
Plaintiff: CORDELIA EVANS and CORDELIA CLOUTTERBUCK
Defendant: ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01614
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01575
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00626
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLCOMB v. ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2018cv00348
Plaintiff: ROBERT HOLCOMB
Defendant: ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?