Cases 51 - 60 of 209
Cowen v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
as 3:2018cv02166
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Plaintiff:
Cody Cowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
English v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Denton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2018cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mitchell
Defendant:
Denton County Sheriff's Office, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, FNU Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dykes v. Aramark Corporation
as 4:2018cv01414
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Dykes
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Henderson et al
as 4:2018cv01374
Plaintiff:
Raymond Turner
Defendant:
Rand Henderson, ARAMARK Correctional Services LLC and Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Henderson et al ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE SD/TX HOUSTON DIVISION***
as 1:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Raymond Turner
Defendant:
Rand Henderson, Aramark Correctional Services LLC and FNU Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Emmitt et al
as 4:2018cv00877
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Watson, Corey Norris, Gregory Scott Richardson and others
Defendant:
Ed Emmitt, Ed Gonzales, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martina v. ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 5:2018cv00014
Defendant:
ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and ALBERTSONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lynn Martina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cruse v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Andrew Clinton Cruse, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brickey v. Aramark et al
as 4:2017cv03510
Plaintiff:
Brickey Juan Manuel, Sr.
Defendant:
Aramark and Harris County Commissary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
