Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. English et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jamar Mayweathers-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Jayson English, Robert Carter, Jr, John Galipeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turnipseed v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Barney D. Turnipseed
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services LLC and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRUNDY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00400
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GRUNDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOYD v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2011cv00738
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE, CHAPLAIN SCHAEFER, CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAVON TYVELL BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
