Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Dwayne Strickland et al v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 2:2015cv07823
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Strickland , Eric Hillner , Brian Rauter and others
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia v. Aramark Uniform Services et al
as 6:2014cv01254
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garcia
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform Services II, Inc. , Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC , Aramark Business & Industry, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon v. Cole et al
as 5:2014cv03138
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gordon, Sr.
Defendant:
Brian Cole, Timothy Phelps, Eve Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cox v. Aramark Food Service, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02406
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, LLC , fnu Hightower and fnu Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Berends v. Shawnee County Jail et al
as 5:2013cv03024
Plaintiff:
Luke Dean Berends
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hachmeister v. Kline et al
as 5:2012cv03263
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Hachmeister
Defendant:
Richard Kline, Brian Cole, Tim Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foshee v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2012cv03230
Plaintiff:
John Harold Foshee
Defendant:
James Heimgartner, Correct Care Solutions, State Board of Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Denning et al
as 2:2012cv02571
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
Frank Denning , Aramark Food Services , Derrick (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richard-White v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 6:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
Tina D. Richard-White
Defendant:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
