Cases 41 - 50 of 123
TROUTMAN v. EDMONDS et al
as 2:2017cv00376
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, F. BUSBY, S. EDMONDS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TROUTMAN
Mediator:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWERY v. WHITE et al
as 1:2017cv02594
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE (SUPERVISOR), COATS, HARRIS and others
Miscellaneou:
CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL - CIC (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Wright et al
as 2:2016cv01240
Plaintiff:
Leon Eugene White, Jr
Defendant:
CO Wright , CO Sarosh, House of Corrections Health Care Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2016cv00353
Defendant:
ARAMARK LLC, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HALL and SCOTT HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARBLE v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00345
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MARBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PURDY v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00337
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
KEITH PURDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIEFNER v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00329
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. KIEFNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RUSH v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00325
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUY v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES
as 2:2016cv00303
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES
Plaintiff:
DANTE D. GUY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDAVID v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00280
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and ARAMARK LLC
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
