Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tipton et al v. Aramark Services Inc
as 3:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Ida Michelle Tipton and Heith Cornell Mayes
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Aramark Services, Inc. Group Health Plan et al v. AETNA Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Aramark Services, Inc. Group Health Plan, Aramark Services Inc, Aramark Corporation and others
Defendant:
AETNA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Robles v. L3Harris Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robles
Defendant:
L3Harris Technologies, Inc., L3 Technologies, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Osborne v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Reggie Osborne
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. Wiles et al
as 3:2019cv00367
Defendant:
John Doe 1-125, Joanne Bernal, Aramark Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Garza
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00397
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Wilson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. ARAMARK Services, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc and Nabors Offshore Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02522
Plaintiff:
Dionne Washington
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
