Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cuesta Martinez v. Garland
as 22-6545
Petitioner:
ARCESIO ARMANDO CUESTA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villegas et al v. Royal Disposal & Recycle LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00320
Plaintiff:
Catalino Villegas , Jose B. Joya , Erick Castro and others
Defendant:
Royal Disposal & Recycle LLC, David Hanna and Charles C. Gregory, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Garcia (Deopersaud)
as 11-4714
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rodolfo Garcia, Jose Ramon Diaz, Arcesio Maurath and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Karon Deopersaud
Stansell et al v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) et al
as 8:2009cv02308
Defendant:
Carlos Alberto Garcia, Juan Jose Martinez Vega, Efrain Mendez and others
Garnishee:
Capital Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., BNP Paribas and others
Not Classified By Court:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Jonathan N. Janis, Greer C. Janis, Judith G. Janis and others
Claimant:
Brunello, Ltd., Plainview Florida II, Inc., Golfrate Holdings (Angola) LDA and others
Interested Party:
Terrabank, N.A., Stanchart Securities International, Inc. and Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Petitioner:
Leucadendra 325, LLC, 1425 Brickell Ave 64e LLC, 200g PSA Holdings LLC and others
Intervenor:
HS AD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Duque et al v. 140 Broadway et al
as 1:2007cv06292
Plaintiff:
Maria I. Duque and Arcesio Cuellar
Defendant:
140 Broadway, MSDW 140 Broadway Property, L.L.C., 22 Cortlandt Street and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
