Cases 11 - 20 of 20
ALCOA CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv01261
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
INTALCO ALUMINUM, LLC, NORTHWEST ALLOYS, INC., ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BEHERNS et al v. ARCONIC, INC.
as 2:2019cv02664
Plaintiff:
ALK HAXHISEFA, PAULOS TEKLE, HANIFE MACIT and others
Defendant:
ARCONIC, INC., ALCOA INC, SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIGHE v. ARCONIC INC.
as 2:2019cv02185
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA TIGHE
Defendant:
ARCONIC INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv17419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCONIC INC. v. NOVELIS INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01434
Plaintiff:
ARCONIC INC.
Defendant:
NOVELIS INC. and NOVELIS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SULLIVAN v. ARCONIC INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
JANET L. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ARCONIC INC., KLAUS KLEINFELD, ROBERT S. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Arconic Inc. v. Stokar
as 1:2017cv01644
Plaintiff:
Arconic Inc. and Arconic, Inc. (Delaware)
Defendant:
Ellen J. Stokar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLINTON et al
as 2:2017mc00739
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHAUNCEY CLINTON
Garnishee:
ARCONIC, INC.
HOWARD v. ARCONIC INC et al
as 2:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
MARTIN HOWARD
Defendant:
ARCONIC INC and KLAUS KLEINFELD
Movant:
IRONWORKERS LOCALS 40, 361 & 417- UNION SECURITY FUNDS , IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 - JOINT FUNDS and SHOPMEN FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
