Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Kilman v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Tobi Kilman
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Dean Williams, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilman v. Williams, et al
as 19-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBI KILMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., ARISTEDES ZAVARES, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., FRANK GUNTER, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C. and others
Kilman v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv02265
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Aristedes Zavares, John Suthers and others
Plaintiff:
Tobi Kilman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havens v. CDOC, et al
as 16-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL HAVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF COLORADO, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Toevs v. Milyard, et al
as 13-1476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANOS TOEVS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN MILYARD, RICK RAEMISCH, DCOC, ARISTEDES ZAVARES and others
Dmytryszyn v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 12-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM DMYTRYSZYN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, FAULK, Superintendent, and Captain John Doe and others
Dmytryszyn v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 12-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM DMYTRYSZYN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, FAULK, Superintendent, and Captain John Doe and others
In re: Dmytryszyn
as 12-1415
Petitioner:
ADAM DMYTRYSZYN
Respondent:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, FAULK, Superintendent, and Captain John Doe and others
Toevs v. Milyard et al
as 1:2012cv02532
Plaintiff:
Janos Toevs
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard, Kevin (I) Milyard, Tom Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dmytryszyn v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv01690
Plaintiff:
Adam Dmytryszyn
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Tom Clements, Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
