Cases 31 - 40 of 119
DeAndra Stephenson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1874
Petitioner / Appellant:
DeAndra Stephenson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Henry Harmon v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Henry A. Harmon
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Nathan Chism v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-1858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction and James Gibson, Warden, Varner Unit, Arkansas Division of Correction
Alan Doering v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 23-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alan Lewis Doering
Defendant / Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Governor, Arkansas, Wendy Kelley, Previous Director, ADC, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC and others
Courtney Douglas v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Courtney Jerrell Douglas
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1533
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Eugene Wesley v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1306
Petitioner:
Eugene Wesley
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Jessie Hill v. Does, et al
as 23-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Dexter Payne, Arkansas Division of Correction and Asa Hutchinson
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, B Carroll, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeAndra Stephenson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1103
Petitioner / Appellant:
DeAndra Stephenson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
