Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Pineda Rosa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1682
Petitioner:
SARAI ELIZABETH PINEDA ROSA, SONIA ADALI RODRIGUEZ PINEDA, EDWIN ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ RENDEROS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez Guerra et al v. Jaddou et al
as 4:2023cv04030
Plaintiff:
Cesar Armando Rodriguez Guerra, Elizabeth Macarena Trevino Villareal, Bruno Armando Rodriguez Trevino and others
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, CHIEF IIPO ALISSA EMMEL, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Rodriguez
as 23-50069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Armando Rodriguez
US v. Joel Rodriguez
as 21-4317
Defendant / Appellant:
JOEL ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Armando Rodriguez-Cervantes v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70848
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES
In re: Robert Saavedra, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, I, et al
as 20-17327
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, a German corporation, DR. ING. H.C. F. PORSCHE AG, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, MICKEY GAINES and ROBERT SAAVEDRA
Not Classified By Court:
In re: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL" MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Rodriguez-Mejia v. Barr
as 20-2155
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Raul Armando Rodriguez-Mejia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armando Munoz Rodriguez v. William Barr
as 19-71109
Petitioner:
ARMANDO MUNOZ RODRIGUEZ, AKA Armando Rodriguez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
