Cases 31 - 40 of 273
Wade et al v. Industrial Supply et al
as 2:2022cv00097
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Carrier Corporation, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Wade and Deana Lyn Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 22-4007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALAND BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, PETE AGUILAR, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, COLIN Z. ALLRED, in their capacity as United States House Representatives and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boggs v. Armstrong Relocation Co.
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Leah M Boggs
Defendant:
Armstrong Relocation Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Armstrong v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00524
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawton v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2021cv02930
Plaintiff:
John Lawton and John E. Lawton
Defendant:
Deana (I) Armstrong and Deana Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Armstrong
as 21-8075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EVAN AUBREY ARMSTRONG
Givis et al v. Parker
as 4:2021cv00386
Petitioner:
Kris Givis, Jeremy Newton, Andre Fuller and others
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Montrose County School District RE-1J v. Skyline Roofing Inc et al
as 1:2021cv02342
Counter Defendant:
Montrose County School District RE-1J
Defendant:
Skyline Roofing Inc., Adam Stout, NV5, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Armstrong Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Growtech Industries LLC v. Mary Mechanix LLP et al
as 5:2021cv00841
Plaintiff:
Growtech Industries LLC
Defendant:
Mary Mechanix LLP, MMX LLC, Cryder Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
