Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 273
Armstrong v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00041
Plaintiff: Kent Armstrong
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court: SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Armstrong et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation
as 5:2022cv00225
Plaintiff: Douglas Armstrong
Defendant: Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wade et al v. Industrial Supply et al
as 2:2022cv00097
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems, Carrier Corporation, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: Howard Wade and Deana Lyn Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2012
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boggs v. Armstrong Relocation Co.
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff: Leah M Boggs
Defendant: Armstrong Relocation Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Brunson v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff: Raland J. Brunson
Defendant: Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00524
Petitioner: Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawton v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2021cv02930
Plaintiff: John Lawton and John E. Lawton
Defendant: Deana (I) Armstrong and Deana Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Armstrong We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-8075
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EVAN AUBREY ARMSTRONG
Givis et al v. Parker
as 4:2021cv00386
Petitioner: Kris Givis, Jeremy Newton, Andre Fuller and others
Respondent: David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?