Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Gonzalez v. Naumann/Hobbs Material Handling Corporation II Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Naumann/Hobbs Material Handling Corporation II Incorporated , Bryan Armstrong and Unknown Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong et al v. Brown Olcott PLLC et al
as 2:2015cv02368
Plaintiff:
Jayson Armstrong and Rachel Armstrong
Defendant:
Brown Olcott PLLC and Philip N Brown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02317
Plaintiff:
Kristy Armstrong
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Armstrong v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01508
Petitioner:
Shad Daniel Armstrong
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and James O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Armstrong v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00358
Petitioner:
Shad Daniel Armstrong
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and James O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. American Multi-Cinema Incorporated
as 2:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Thomas Armstrong
Defendant:
American Multi-Cinema Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Armstrong et al v. Carlson Restaurants Worldwide Incorporated
as 2:2014cv00295
Defendant:
Carlson Restaurants Worldwide Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Armstrong and Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Armstrong v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2013cv01421
Plaintiff:
Andre William Armstrong
Defendant:
Tyrone Mitchell and James Logon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Brotherton et al
as 2:2013cv01264
Plaintiff:
Andre William Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Brotherton, Joseph M Arpaio, JS Jed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
