Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Armstrong v. Potomac Disposal, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01470
Plaintiff:
Cedric Armstrong
Defendant:
Potomac Disposal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Mistler v. Worthington Armstrong Venture (WAVE)
as 1:2015cv03458
Plaintiff:
Craig Mistler
Defendant:
Worthington Armstrong Venture (WAVE)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Maher et al v. NationStar Mortgage LLC
as 8:2015cv02256
Defendant:
NationStar Mortgage LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brelsford Maher and Jennifer Armstrong Maher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burton v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2015cv01420
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tawney v. AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01194
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., CBS Corporation, Eaton Electrical Corporation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Domco Products Texas Inc., Goodrich Corporation, Navistar Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Tawney
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Frank Houser
Counter Defendant:
Autozone Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
