Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armstrong v. Shipley et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armstrong
Defendant:
Amy Shipley, Laura Barner, Dr Dehner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lillie v. Iowa, State of et al
as 5:2022cv04012
Defendant:
Unity Point Health, Iowa, State of, Woodbury County, Iowa and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Lynn Lillie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Armstrong v. Luyties, et al
as 1:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Aaron S. Armstrong and Aaron S Armstrong
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Michael Luyties and Pacific Sky Productions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv01006
Plaintiff:
Robert E Armstrong
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Armstrong v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv03166
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Armstrong
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Timothy Armstrong et al v American Pallet Leasing Inc et al
as 5:2007cv04107
Defendant:
American Pallet Leasing Inc, Kirkpatrick and Lockhart, Preston, Gates, Ellis, LLP, First Southwest Company and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Armstrong, Wanda Armstrong, Todd Atenhan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
