Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Armstrong v. Coleman Professional Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jacob Armstrong
Defendant:
Coleman Professional Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gonzales et al. v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward Gonzales, Kent Kilgore, Adam Plouse and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State Univesity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Okonski v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Okonski, Stephanie Clark, Eduardo Barbosa and others
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Armstrong v. Progressive Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01769
Plaintiff:
Marcia Armstrong
Defendant:
Progressive Life Insurance Company and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Greene
as 4:2023cv00941
Petitioner:
Richard James Armstrong
Respondent:
Sheriff Jerry Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nolan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L. Nolan and Ann Vosburg
Defendant:
Richard D. Wetzel, Kathy Smedley, Paul John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Melinda Armstrong
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. Verizon Wireless
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Richard Armstrong
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
