Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Hempstead County Hunting Club v. Southwestern Electric Power Co We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3456
Plaintiff - Appellee: Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Southwestern Electric Power Company
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Jeffrey R. Eckstein, District Engineer, Vicksburg District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, United States Department of the Interior and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Southwestern Electric Power Co We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3452
Plaintiff - Appellee: Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Audubon Arkansas and others
Plaintiff: Granville Parnell
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Colonel Jeffrey R. Eckstein, In his Official Capacity as current District Engineer, Vicksburg District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant: Southwestern Electric Power Company
Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Southwestern Electric Power Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv04098
Plaintiff: Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc.
Defendant: Southwestern Electric Power Company, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jeffrey R Eckstein and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sierra Club et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv04017
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Audubon Arkansas and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Jeffrey R Eckstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Sierra Club et al v. Clinton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02622
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Sierra Club, Sierra Club and others
Defendant: Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton, James Steinberg and others
Intervenor: Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Robbins et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2009cv03037
Plaintiff: G. Thomas Robbins and Jane G. Robbins
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and United States Army Corps of Engineers Engineering and Construction Division Hydraulics and Technical Services Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Type: Real Property None
Guy Choate, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 09-1293
Plaintiff - Appellee: Guy Choate and Jeffrey Rickman
Defendant - Appellant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Colonel Donald E. Jackson, Jr., District Engineer, Little Rock, Arkansas District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant: MBC Development Group LLC, formerly known as Belz-Burrow Development Group LLC
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District v. Union Electric Company
as 1:2008cv00174
Plaintiff: Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District
Defendant: Union Electric Company
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
Guy Choate, et al v. MBC Development Group
as 08-3754
Plaintiff - Appellee: Guy Choate and Jeffrey Rickman
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Colonel Donald E. Jackson, Jr., District Engineer, Little Rock, Arkansas District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant - Appellant: MBC Development Group LLC, formerly known as Belz-Burrow Development Group LLC
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2255
Plaintiff - Appellant: Yankton Sioux Tribe, and its individual members
Defendant - Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, George S. Dunlop, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?