Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 139
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 1:2014cv23632
Plaintiff: Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper , Dan Kipnis , Miami-Dade Reef Guard Association and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. et al v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00178
Plaintiff: GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Brian Barrs
Defendant: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Thomas J. Tickner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-13739
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. and DAVID JAMES
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and JON CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 14-13739
Defendant / Appellee: JON CHYTKA, in his official Capacity as Commander, Mobile District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID JAMES and GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC.
Interested Party: FLORIDA CARRY, INC.
Florida Wildlife Federation In, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-13392
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee: FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC, ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC. and CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC.
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant: SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. et al v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 4:2014cv00139
Consolidated Plaintiff: Brain Barrs
Plaintiff: GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and David James
Defendant: Jon J. Chytka and The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Consolidated Defendant: Thomas J. Tickner
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-12357
Plaintiff - Appellant: BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, JON CHYTKA, U.S. Arm Corps of Engineers, Mobile District and others
: SERVICE
Mobile Baykeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff: Mobile Baykeeper, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , Thomas P. Bostick and Jon J. Chytka
Intervenor_defendant: Plains Southcap Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc. et al v. State Supervisor and Field Supervisor of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2013cv81285
Plaintiff: Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc. , Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: State Supervisor and Field Supervisor of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Secretary of the Interior, Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0181
Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc. et al v. State Supervisor and Field Supervisor of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2013cv14477
Plaintiff: Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc. , Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: State Supervisor and Field Supervisor of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Secretary of the Interior, Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0181

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?