Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Arredondo v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
Jose Arredondo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Arredondo v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jessica Arredondo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arredondo v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arredondo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oscar Ruben Arredondo v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv01345
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ruben Arredondo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mirna D. Arredondo v. Andrew M. Saul
as 5:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Mirna D Arredondo and Mirna D. Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Monica Arredondo v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2021cv01036
Plaintiff:
Monica Arredondo
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Arredondo v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2021cv01681
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ARREDONDO
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commisioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Oscar Ruben Arredondo v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv02275
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ruben Arredondo
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arredondo v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv04262
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Ken Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Arredondo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00852
Plaintiff:
Juan Arredondo Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
